addressalign-toparrow-leftarrow-rightbackbellblockcalendarcameraccwcheckchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-small-downchevron-small-leftchevron-small-rightchevron-small-upchevron-upcircle-with-checkcircle-with-crosscircle-with-pluscrossdots-three-verticaleditemptyheartexporteye-with-lineeyefacebookfolderfullheartglobegmailgooglegroupshelp-with-circleimageimagesinstagramlinklocation-pinm-swarmSearchmailmessagesminusmoremuplabelShape 3 + Rectangle 1ShapeoutlookpersonJoin Group on CardStartprice-ribbonShapeShapeShapeShapeImported LayersImported LayersImported Layersshieldstartickettrashtriangle-downtriangle-uptwitteruserwarningyahoo

Re: [astrology-25] Re: The Art of Predicition

From: art g.
Sent on: Thursday, July 12, 2007 4:37 PM
I disagree. Compare face-to-face meetings to the organic process of planting a good seed in good soil: such is an event (or analogous event) to chart, because among other things, it establishes the so-called chemistry upon which the real question: "is this person for me" is at first relevant. No one who's Interned dated for a while will agree that chemistry can come out of e-mail. So--as those with experience (especially males, who "traditionally" send about ten e-mails for every one a female sends out--and that ratio is probably more like 50-1)-- e-mails over the Internet at dating services are like casting seed and chaff onto the rocks: If one miraculously blooms, which moment do you chart? The reckless casting of the seed or the moment the sprout bursts through the soil? The former is e-mail, the latter a face-to-face...where the real first encounter lies. This isn't a birth, it's a relationship, so these mystical "seeding" moments shouldn't even apply. The moment that matters comes a few --seconds, minutes?--after the two actually meet. Neither inception charts nor horary charts could find a better time to scope.
Art Gatti
----- Original Message -----
From: Maria
Sent: Thursday, July 12,[masked]:58 PM
Subject: [astrology-25] Re: The Art of Predicition

Thanks to all that answered. It's interesting to read different takes on the situation.
 
I did a chart of the time my friend first asked me to do a chart concerning this guy from online.
The Ascendant ruler and ruler of the chart is retrograde. So it's p robably not a good time for a new relationship or a new undertaking of any kind for her.  She would be more likely to return to a previous relationship or situation than develop this new one.
 
Then I did another chart for the time that my friend first emailed questions to the guy through the online email service for him to answer. The Ascendant ruler for that chart is also Rx,
 
In the real life situation, they have made plans to meet this weekend. Should be interesting to see what happens then.
 
I checked with my Kepler computer astrology program and it had this to say about charting:
 
Remember too that you MUST use the exact time and place of the VERY FIRST arising or receiving of a question. A first meeting, first date, signing of a contract, receipt of a telephone call or opening of a letter, or the very first occurrence of a particular event are all
suitable times for horary analysis, for the question is implied in the event itself. It is also possible to use the time and place that a question becomes very urgent, important, or critical to you, but there usually is an event that has occurred that triggers the question.
 
        Frivolous or impertinent questions likewise yield no useful information. It usually does no good to ask a question that has already been asked before, by yourself or anyone else. One temptation is to ask the question again and again and produce another one of these
reports either in hopes of gaining greater clarification or in hopes of getting different information. This will not work! If you use a valid date and time and you read this report carefully, you should obtain a great deal of useful information.
 
Maria
 
On 7/12/07, Maria Escudero Wander <[address removed]> wrote:

This is a question for the prediction buffs. I have a friend who started doing online dating. In the past I have done charts of first meeting for her. Since the online service allows you to email with each other, their first meeting has actually been online via email.  I can't figure out when their first meeting is.
 
The online service does a matching with participants and sends out a list to the parties involved. She opened up this list and sent out a series of question to this guy at time A. He read and answered the questions at time B. To my way of thinking, time B is the time of their first meeting.
 
Do you think so as well? I can't decide if I should use that time or if I should just do a horary for the time that she asked me the question to make a chart for her about this fellow. What would you choose?
 
Maria





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list ([address removed])
This message was sent by Maria ([address removed]) from The New York City Astrology Meetup.
To learn more about Maria, visit his/her member profile
To unsubscribe or to update your mailing list settings, click here

Meetup.com Customer Service: [address removed]
632 Broadway New York NY 10012 USA

People in this
Meetup are also in:

Sign up

Meetup members, Log in

By clicking "Sign up" or "Sign up using Facebook", you confirm that you accept our Terms of Service & Privacy Policy